Western CivilizationWhen it comes to the ancient empire of the Persians , Greeks and Romans a great flock of the success of these empires derived from their successful economies that were based upon their brilliant faculty to force mentally trade strategies and their dubious use of slave industry and compound triumph . Additionally , a strong commutation policy-making authority combined with in good order military forces helped solidify much(prenominal) powerWithout a powerful , central leader , then the competency for a powerful empire to exist is nil . The background signal for this is , of course , without effective and powerful leadership , an empire topaz not survive . Consider Alexander the Great and his electrical shock on Greece : under Alexander , the empire expanded exp onentially throughout the world as his m ilitary leadership direct to the conquest of numerous lands and people . By removing such a powerful authority figure from the equation , Greece could very soundly amaze remained a weak nation susceptible to attack and conquestIn hurt of the way these powerful nations treated those whom they conquered was very mischievously to adduce the least .
In virtually all instances conquered and in use(p) countries were strained into slavery to serve their new overlords . In the lineament of the Persians and Romans , subjected conquered nations to recurrent sexual humiliation was habitualplace . One obscure side n eb to the concept of conquering weaker natio! ns , it is most common for the conqueror / coloniser to substitute its socialisation and eliminate the culture of the conquered nation . When the Romans conquered the Greeks , the Romans appropriated the Gods and worship of the Greeks as opposed to imposing one upon them . Granted , the Greeks were coerce to recognize the Roman Emperor as a God...If you regard to get a full essay, modulate it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment